Features of Exploitation Strategy

Features of using Strategy1.1 Exploitation StrategyExploitation synopsis and activities go on for the entire life of the swan, taking advantage of any progress-step and achievement. The exploitation approach of the project has been structured in a repeated cycle in which every step enables refining to define a list of activities implementing exploitation. The sequence consists of the chase itemsIdentification of exploitable resultsEvery identified project outcome is rated to check its eligibility for exploitation resulting items atomic number 18 listed and classified by subject matter of typology (product, carry through, method, data etc.) to understand the ways in which they can be shared, delivered and accessed. For from separately i result, the level of protection is be, although it can be specialized during succeeding(a) locomote of analysis, to allow IPR to be different for the various involved stakeholders. Results are withal given a priority that represents the ir importance among the exploitation activities.Identification of stakeholdersExploitable results are associated with the groups of stakeholders identified by the project (education, technical developers, industries, public communities, authorities, policy makers, etc.). The check out between the results and groups of stakeholders identifies different sets of results this step of the exploitation definition process considers the hazard to group them in subsets to handle them together or beca drill of their dep lastencies. Therefore, exploitation deals with these collections of bundles with customary featuresspecific purpose the common aim of the result set suit of business the area of activity of the stakeholders that can be addressed need resources elements needed to make the bundle sustainableAssociation with actionsThis is the conclusion of each cycle of the process. The purpose is to establish the concrete activities that implement exploitation. The actions are defined in rel ation to the results of the previous steps concerning stakeholders and bundles each exploitable result is associated with one or more bundles related to a set or a single stakeholder group.The actions are grouped in a set of focuses that see specific areas of activities technology development, knowledge building, educational training, standards development, services development, IPR protection, policy devising etc.As in the preceding steps, the definition of these actions can be refined and updated during the life of the project.1.2 Exploitable ResultsTo identify the exploitable results of each partner and the current extract of these results a table was constructed with these results, the state of this results and the possible audience. The results are presented in slacken 2.1 collects the exploitable results identified by the partners at this stage of the project (Month 12). The description of each result is based on partners contribution and should be considered from a anter ior perspective to draft the initial version of the Exploitation Report. Next versions of this overlay provide include further description of each result if required. elude 1 Exploitable results of COMPINNOVA and their state up to month 12A/AExploitable Result DescriptionClassificationInvolved PartnersStakeholdersActions M6-M121Bulk accelerator pedal development work and productSUNscientific community, powder framework industries, investorsExperiments, testify of proper bulk pellet atom smasher development2Thin film catalyst developmentProcess and productNTUAscientific community, powder satisfying industries, investorsExperiments, evidence of proper thin film catalyst development3Use of the Lorentz force activation for redox processProcess and methodNTUAScientific community, powder material industries, investorsExperiments, firstborn evidence of activation of surfaces and redox process4Integrated bench industrial plant for hydrogen productionProcess and systemNTUAScienti fic community, energy producers and users, industries, Governments, investorsinitial evidence of hydrogen production, initial market analysis, initial contacts with Public source Corporation (Greece)5Integrated bench plant for hydrocarbon productionProcess and systemSUNScientific community, energy producers and users, industries, Governments, investorsExperiments, initial contacts with ENEA (Italy)6Multiscale exemplar and explanation of the process of hydrogen productionSimulation and modelingIPSASScientific communityQualitative analysis of the electro-magneto-chemical process7Powder manufacturing as precursor for catalyst manufacturingProcess and productNTUAScientific community, powder material industries, investorsExperiments, publication of the method for powder production (see 2nd dissemination report)1.3 Exploitation ManagementEXIS acts as Exploitation Manager heading the Exploitation perpetration (EC) with representatives from NTUA, SUN, CRANFIELD, FU SAV. The Exploitation Committee supervises the prudence of IPR and coordinates the definition of the exploitation plan. Specifically, the HELENIC-REF EC shall ordain and implement exploitation activitiesPropose IPR and exploitation strategies and (eventual) associated updates to the mob Agreement (CA) lead to proper exploitation of the results by supporting all PartnersMonitor the use of resources for exploitation issues.The Exploitation Activities are in close relation with dispersion Activities (as they are -or will be- presented in Deliverables D4.14-D4.18) in order to achieve a sustained impact. The approach of HELENIC-REF for achieving a sustained impact is presented in the following Figure 2.2.Figure 2.2 HELENIC-REF approach for sustained impact1.4 IPR ManagementThe management of IPR is strictly ruled by the Consortium Agreement (CA) which includes all aliment related to the management of IPR including ownership, protection and publication of knowledge, access rights to knowledge and preexist know-how as well as questions of confidentiality, liability and dispute settlement. In the CA, the Partners progress to identified the background knowledge included and excluded.The CA regulates the ownership of results (Section 8 of the CA)The knowledge acquired during the project shall be considered as a property of the asseverator generating it, and in this sense the originator is entitled to use and to license much(prenominal) right without any financial compensation to the other contributors. If the features of a word invention are such(prenominal) that it is not possible to separate them, the contributors could gibe that they may jointly apply to obtain and/or maintain the germane(predicate) rights and shall make effort to reach appropriate agreements to do so.The CA besides regulates the pitch of results ownership (Section 8.2 of the CA)Each signer society may transfer ownership of its own Foreground following the procedures of the Grant Agreement oblige 30.Each S ignatory Party may identify specific leash parties it intends to transfer the ownership of its Foreground to in Attachment (3) to the CA. The other Signatory Parties hereby waive their right to prior notice and their right to target area a transfer to listed third parties per the Grant Agreement Article 30.1The transferring Party shall, however, at the time of the transfer, inform the other Parties of such transfer and shall fancy that the rights of the other Parties will not be affected by such transfer.Any addition after the signature of the CA requires a conclusiveness of the Project Steering Committee (PSC).Status of IPR (M12)As the project reaches its first year, the results from the ongoing research about proving the ability of Hydrogen production and the reducing of water with Lorentz forces are promising. The results once fully verified, can subject to publications or even patents. The project may deliver additional results by the end of the project that the partnership may wish to exploit. In this case the Consortium (headed by the Exploitation Manager) will discuss use of such results on a case-by-case basis.For the management of knowledge, the consortium and the Exploitation Manager are regularly monitor and evaluate possibilities of IPR. The consortium has already defined rising activities to discuss and evaluate raising questions. According to the initial plan, at the next general meetings these discussions will take place. At all upcoming meetings as session will be devoted to IPR and exploitation issues to further propound the plans of the consortium.Any third parties that may involve in exploitation will sign a non-disclosure agreement.